[Krzysztof]

… one thing to add. We are very happy with software/hardware licensing provided. I did not want to sound negative – and i am sorry if my previous post looked like that.

[Krzysztof]

The main reason use Sentinel=>Gemalto=>Thales(now) licensing hardware+software was to concentrate on core business and leave dealing with complexities of keeping licensing software and hardware secure to third party.

We would certainly appreciate more transparency when/if trouble arises and there are hacks / cracks surfacing. There is nothing bad if these surface, provided that you are quickly on top of it and provide clear information to your licensing SDKs users on what the threat is and how it will be dealt with.

It would be pretty bad story at the end if customer reports back to us and tells “hey, and btw the license keys you use can be easily emulated” leaving us in the dark on what is going on.

Chris

[Krzysztof]

Hi!

What it envisioned future of hardware based licensing – Thales/Gemalto HL based? What about network license keys (announced as not available to new customers?).

[Krzysztof]

Will do!

Steffen, this is really appreciated.

Thank you!

[Krzysztof]

Thank you!

[Krzysztof]

Stefan. Thank you for very quick answer. What about the Network Key? Do you know how long this would be available to purchase for existing customers?

That would be important in looking to when we would be faced with migrating to pushing network licenses into HL keys instead of just getting network enabled keys.

Chris

[Krzysztof]

Do you already have EOL/EOS envisioned? And if yes, then what platform would replace it?